有名!

有名!2: Fukuzawa Yukichi

Anybody who has visited Japan will have seen Fukuzawa Yukichi on nearly a daily basis, though they may not know it. His serious face and stalwart image is indeed involved in many everyday transactions. Even if you haven’t set foot even close to Japan yet, then the first few pages of a textbook on Japanese will undoubtedly present his image to you. And in both cases, he’s usually worth about £70, $110 or ¥10000.

Of course, having your face printed on the one side of a yen bill is truly a mark of a nation’s recognition for the work that one has undertaken, however awareness of Fukuzawa very rarely goes further than this, if indeed one is aware even of his presence on Japanese money. So, why is he so celebrated? What did this man borne into a family of both honour and hardship do that gives him the right to be recognised by every Japanese person every single day of their lives..?

1835. Not exactly a time noted for serenity in Japan. Nor was it a time of particular significance, until of course little Yukichi came along. The shogunate, though having been all powerful as the ruling power of the nation for a good two hundred years, was more or less on its knees, and the masses were more than agitating for something new to come along. Feudal law had been thrust upon Japan by the Tokugawa Shogunate of the 1600s, and had in many ways been heralded as a raging success. Devotion and pride were the cornerstones of the shogunate, however it was these self same attributes that meant that it had absolutely no mechanism for change, and now, in an increasingly modernising globe, Japan was soon becoming dilapidated and more importantly, impoverished. Something simply had to be done.

Being borne into a low ranking samurai family in the 1800s did not have all that many advantages. In fact, come to think of it, there probably weren’t any at all. You see, the general public had been told for centuries that if you were samurai, then you were somehow better, that your family lineage was untouchable, and more valuable to Japan. Not exactly the starting point for a healthy inter-class relationship, is it? Furthermore, transcending the gap between commoner and samurai was not a feat often accomplished, and so your rank in society more or less chained you to your destiny. What had once been heralded as a mark of power by many nations of the world, was now being seen as an isolationist shackle that did nothing more than chastise the people of Japan. And so, Fukuzawa’s family was neither respected by the upper levels of the samurai caste, nor were they appreciated by the public.

When Fukuzawa was just eighteen months old, his father unexpectedly passed away, which resulted in the only source of income for the family to be more or less stubbed out. With so many mouths to feed, the outlook was not good. The quicksand of poverty began tugging at their feet, and sure enough the stinking mire of impecuniousness was encroaching nearer and nearer to the Fukuzawa household. At that time, Japanese children were usually admitted into education at the age of four, however due to the lack of funding for the basic essentials in life, school was not something high on the list of priorities for Mother Fukuzawa. Instead, Yukichi found himself cobbling together sandals, and completing other odd jobs in order to supplement the tiny stipend that the shogunate made available to a samurai’s widow. It wasn’t until Fukuzawa reached his fourteenth birthday that education became something that the family could consider.

Observe then, the situation thus far. Fukuzawa has been told that his family is important. He has lived, breathed and digested the jingoism of the shogunate for so long, that the very essence of self-importance would be nothing more than glorified bigotry, fed intravenously into his mind. Then, to find that the family cannot even afford to send its son to school; now that must really have baked his noodle, and could perhaps have been the instigating event for what was to come.

Fukuzawa however, was never one to sit on his laurels and expect destiny to pick him up and sit him atop a throne, oh no. By 1853, Japan was still obstinately refusing entry of any foreigners into Japan, apart from at one small port on the man-made island of Dejima. His elder brother, now assuming the role of his late father, sent Fukuzawa to Nagasaki to learn Dutch in order that he could become expert on the ways of Western warfare, and learn something about the customs of the Americans. Now, you do not need to be one Hercule Poirot to realise that Dutch and the Americans were about as irreconcilable as Welsh and the French. Coupled with that, his teacher of Dutch despised his talent and natural flare (something I have come up against myself, alas…*) and so the teacher, being about as maleficent as he possibly could, span a yarn that Mother Fukuzawa was unbelievably ill, and that Yukichi would have to be at her bedside through her final hours. Seeing through the fabrication, Fukuzawa was outraged, and left his teacher. Having absolutely no money, and no way now of making any, he was stuck between the wrong language and a very hard place, and had no choice but to forge his brother’s signature, and charge the family for his expenses. With this money he set his sights high, and decided to make a beeline for the capital of Japan, Edo. And it was at this point, with a conscience that must have been emotionally battered and physically drained by past experiences, that the rest of Fukuzawa’s life unbelievably began to open up like a book.

What must be said, is that Fukuzawa absorbed knowledge like a sponge put out to dry in the baking heat. His ability to gorge on comprehension meant that against all odds, Fukuzawa was able to effectively learn both the arts and the sciences at breakneck speed. Being almost fluent in Dutch, he was able to translate books that filtered into Japan from Dejima, the first of which was a book dedicated to the ‘art’ of fort building. His interest in the sciences peaked with both chemistry and biology, and his adeptness to quantify and qualify his findings was becoming more than noticed by the top echelons of society in Japan. Not bad for somebody who didn’t cross the playground until fourteen, is it?

By the autumn of 1858, at the tender age of 23, Fukuzawa had his first real job, by way of appointment as a teacher of Dutch to the vassals of the domain of Nakatsu. A pact between the Americans and the Japanese now meant that more ports were being opened up to foreigners, and so Fukuzawa went to investigate. His findings however, came irrefutably to a halt when he realised that these bizarre white people spoke no more Dutch than he spoke Afrikaans. And it is here, as simply a mere mortal, that I would have packed up my kitbag, pulled my kimono tighter around myself, and ambled with an uncontrollable rage back to that place whence I came. Fukuzawa however, having some kind of super-human ability to overcome all obstacles, set to learning English!

The shogunate, having realised by this point that non-cooperation with the rest of humanity was not an option, had decided to send envoys to the US. Fukuzawa jumped at the chance and in the spring of 1860, he set foot in beautiful San Francisco. And it was during his one-month tour of the States that Fukuzawa obtained a copy of a Webster’s dictionary. Not so interesting you may say, but to many experts far more intuitive than myself, this has been proclaimed as Fukuzawa’s intellectual gateway to understanding modern civilisation. For, dear readers, this was what Fukuzawa began to understand. Being the brunt of societal Japan, and having seen both sides of the coin from such an early age, Fukuzawa was acutely aware of the problems that Japan was facing. He knew that the stalwart engine room of the shogunate was beginning to splutter and choke as the rust of centuries of feudal law began to strip away. In America, and indeed via subsequent tours of the majority of Europe, Fukuzawa saw something different, something that he could appreciate, and something which he came vehemently to believe was an approach to society that Japan must, at the least, observe, and at most, adopt. His first book, Conditions of the West, was immediately a bestseller, and sure enough, the seeds of revolution were becoming more apparent in Japan.

From rags to riches, it would seem that Fukuzawa’s story was passing from strength to strength. However, in no time whatsoever, the very success that Fukuzawa was experiencing, could quite easily be his undoing. You see, the shogunate was all-powerful. Unrest was bubbling under the surface of Japan’s perfectly preened façade, of course, but ultimately the shogunate still resided over Japan with the brunt of its power. And it would be utterly naïve to conceive the notion that there were not people still ready, and able, to lay down their lives for it. In fact, breakaway sects of samurais who despised the influences of Western civilisation that had begun to ooze over Japan, via conduits such as Fukuzawa, were known to mercilessly and fanatically kill those that made even so much as a nod toward Western ideas. Fukuzawa, therefore, was tiptoeing quite vulnerably across a tightrope strung over a raging sea of hungry sharks.

This did not scare him however, and never once did he falter in his quest. And finally, as the shogunate fizzled out like a firework doused in water, the new government of the Restoration asked Fukuzawa to join them, though he was stoic in his response, and declined amiably. Though obviously a rising force in the moulding of modern Japan, Fukuzawa had never had any intention to govern, and wanted not to be a part of any of it. His promulgations came better from the sidelines, and he intended it to be kept that way.

Fukuzawa’s works continued to develop. Branching out from science, he turned his might to philosophy, and the mechanics of a modern society. He brushed with women’s rights, the allegiance between Korea and China, and vested much time and effort in dragging Japan into the new century. Like a shining beacon for change, Fukuzawa managed to inform the perceptions of an entire nation without ever succumbing to politics.

So, you can see, that Fukuzawa Yukichi is a marvel. In a time when propaganda of the state was at its mightiest, in a time when platitudes were considered the nuts and bolts of society, Fukuzawa had the foresight to realise that Japan could not remain the same for eternity. His viewpoints on Western society however, have been highly criticised, generally by people who believe that Fukuzawa wanted to westernise Japan: this is most definitely not the case, for you could not find a person more patriotic to one’s country than him. What he saw in the West however, was an ability to evolve, an ability to adapt, and an ability to govern oneself not through might and dictatorial whitewashing, but in a way that served the people, that chose to educate even the poorest of people because one day, as did Fukuzawa, these could become something of a phenomenon. Some say he is not a genius as he didn’t create anything that the West had not already dealt with, however he was blazing the trail for modernity in Japan, and in a country where change and advancement against the law were seen to be treasonous still; this man was prolific. The sum of his work did not lead to any great uprising, and certainly the people of Japan did not congregate in the streets of Tokyo to herald him as their saviour, however what Fukuzawa managed to achieve was the removing of the shroud, which permitted the masses to engender their own thoughts, and decide their own conclusions.

And so, when you take out that ¥10000 bill, and hand it over for whatever it is that you may be purchasing, just give a moment to Fukuzawa Yukichi. Some call him the Oliver Twist of Japan, others go for the Pied Piper, leading the people to discovery. Still more mark his card as the Forerunner of Change. But for me, he is the proof that anything is possible, that nothing is unachievable. He is of course, the Father of Modern Japan.

* Poetic licence has been used in the self-referential comments throughout this piece. I will not pass go, I will not collect ¥200.

  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print

Discussion

View Comments for “有名!2: Fukuzawa Yukichi”

  • boaby
    Alan MacFarlane, the recently retired Cambridge based historian/anthropologist of England, Japan and Nepal has written a useful book on Fukuzawa, which he has made available as free PDF for download @ http://www.alanmacfarlane.com/TEXTS/FUKUZAWA_final.pdf
  • caughtredhanded
    Thanks for highlighting this, looks pretty comprehensive! Many thanks.
  • wew...continued to be printed on the highest denomination must have been a great appreciation from the nation to him
  • caughtredhanded
    Absolutely! There can't really be a higher one I don't think. Definitely worthy of it in my opinion too.
  • Great write up and story. To be honest, I had never really given much thought to who is on the bills.
  • caughtredhanded
    Thanks for your comments! I don't think many people do take notice, and I think that was my original point. When the figures on the notes were recently changed, he was the only one that remained, and continued to be on the highest denomination. I think that says something, if nothing else!
  • Modernity is just a euphemism for Westernization. Things like universal suffrage,Democracy, and Republic have nothing to do with modernity, not even Capitalism. These are institutions that were used to oppress non-Anglo and women. That's it..... Just because people in the West drive cars and I choose not to because I'm Japanese then that doesn't make me less modern if 90% of the population does the same thing here in Japan. This man you wrote about was a potential poison to society. He tried to pick and take what he wanted from the West - only the best parts presumably - and then blend them into Japanese society. You can't do that. That's why Japan is in decline right now.
  • caughtredhanded
    Tony,

    Many thanks for your comments regarding my article on Fukuzawa, and many thanks for your insightful comments on 'modernity'. Your first sentence is of particular interest to me, as it raises some important questions about motives, conclusions and possibility.

    Of course, 'modernity' comes from the Latin, 'modo', meaning 'just now', and therefore the presumption on a linguistic basis is that the concept that the word represents is indeed from Western philosophy. Of course, it is just a word, and therefore I must reject your conclusion. Of course, so are 'democracy', 'republic' and 'capitalism', which you happen to use in your counter-arguement; interesting at the least.

    What further interests me is your supposition that the elements of your counter-arguement were in fact used to suppress women and those of non-Anglo lineage, or in the context of this arguement, non-Japanese people. Funny then, that Fukuzawa's work is notable in both the area of women's rights, and that of multi-national relations, firstly of Korea, and also of China; both powers and races in Asia with which, both you and I are acutely aware, Japan has not always stood on an equal ground. How wonderful then that Fukuzawa was able to see beyond that and reach out an arm in a most equilateral gesture.

    Also, you start your point by arguing that 'modernity' is in fact a euphemism for 'Westernisation', that they are one and the same, equals in partnership. However you then make a claim that as the West drive cars and therefore presume to be modern, the Japanese would be no less modern if they did not drive cars. Or to put this another way: you make a claim that as the West drive cars and therefore presume to be Westernised, the Japanese would be no less Westernised if they did not drive cars. As such, are you saying that the Japanese are Westernised or not, modern or not; I feel your points are most definitely at cross-purpose.

    Your idea that Fukuzawa (whom you seem not to like to mention by name) was a potential poison to society as he tried to 'manufacture' a different type of society for Japan. Let us hypothesise then what would have happened had the 'Restoration' not gone ahead, and the Shogunate had continued to 'rule' Japan: the Shogunate's stranglehold on society would have increased, its ritualistic nature would have enveloped Japan and chastised it in a methodology that was both antiquated and irrelevant, not to mention the effect it would have had on economics of an already impoverished nation. I am not against the Shogunate per se, just what it meant for Japan's future.

    Sure, you can now argue that Japan, after it was forced to embrace Western values at the end of the war, has found itself in exactly the same position as it was headed towards with the Shogunate, however I get the distinct feeling that Japan would now mean absolutely nothing to the world had it have maintained its course with the Shogunate, and therefore its opinions and its people would have been disregarded; this may not mean that much to some, but in an ever globalised society it means everything. At least now, Japan, much like Britain, has had its fifteen minutes of fame, and is now recognised for its successes and its advances in this world, rather than for nothing at all.

    Blending philosophies, societies and cultures scares many people because the human condition does not take kindly to change, and sees it as an eradication of a nation's independence. Let me state then, that it was this exact independence that was isolating Japan further and yet further from the rest of the world, and it was through conduits such as Fukuzawa, that nations such as Japan have become some of the biggest driving forces of the 'modern age', whatever you believe that to be.
  • [you wrote]Of course, 'modernity' comes from the Latin, 'modo', meaning 'just now', and therefore the presumption on a linguistic basis is that the concept that the word represents is indeed from Western philosophy. Of course, it is just a word, and therefore I must reject your conclusion. Of course, so are 'democracy', 'republic' and 'capitalism', which you happen to use in your counter-arguement; interesting at the least.]

    [me] And this is what I was alluding to, modernity is generally a Western term meaning " if you are Westernized or embrace Western dogma, the rule of law, technology, and so on, then you are "modern." But this term is used loosely. Modern notions of the term itself would mean advanced in industry and the sciences, all of which can be interpreted in different ways to mean different things. The concept of what's considered modern is flawed because it applies to how Westernized a country has become. A better word would be "advanced" since it denotes the development of a civilization regardless of institution. I don't see why Japan can't reject Western fundamentalism completely and yet still be considered an advanced civilization. Modernity has always been synonymous with terms like "equal rights" "democracy" and "capitalism" All of these things are not necessary for every nation and they are certainly not necessary for Japan. Democracy can't work for every nation and neither can capitalism, and most of all neither can Western fundamentalism. Ask the poor Afro-Caribbeans what they think about modernity and why they can't seem to make ends meet at the end of the month. How has their democracy disenfranchised them. Try asking them how Capitalism has benefited their wallets.]



    [you] What further interests me is your supposition that the elements of your counter-arguement were in fact used to suppress women and those of non-Anglo lineage, or in the context of this arguement, non-Japanese people. Funny then, that Fukuzawa's work is notable in both the area of women's rights, and that of multi-national relations, firstly of Korea, and also of China; both powers and races in Asia with which, both you and I are acutely aware, Japan has not always stood on an equal ground. How wonderful then that Fukuzawa was able to see beyond that and reach out an arm in a most equilateral gesture.]

    [me] Fukuzawa was an opportunist and didn't do much to enhance the nation. Yoshida Shoin would've been a better choice of notable Japanese greats. Modernity erodes societies and has for last half of the 20 and 21st Century. It's highly probable to assume that in a hundred years time the Japanese race will be absorbed into the greater Asian demographic much like the Afro/Latin American problem.]

    [me] Also, you start your point by arguing that 'modernity' is in fact a euphemism for 'Westernisation', that they are one and the same, equals in partnership. However you then make a claim that as the West drive cars and therefore presume to be modern, the Japanese would be no less modern if they did not drive cars. Or to put this another way: you make a claim that as the West drive cars and therefore presume to be Westernised, the Japanese would be no less Westernised if they did not drive cars. As such, are you saying that the Japanese are Westernised or not, modern or not; I feel your points are most definitely at cross-purpose.]


    [me] The term "modernity" should be thrown out completely. What's "now?" What are terms like "up-to-date" or words like "current" supposed to mean...? Advances in industry are a hallmark of Western nations, not Asian nations. But does being less industrial make Asians less modern? Again, the term modern only applies to Western nations and not Asian nations. If a Japanese person chooses to walk to work or ride a bicycle in order to protect the environment while shunning the automobile( invention of the West) then he is not less modern/civilized/advanced then his Western counter-part. And he is no less up-to-date either!

    [ you] Your idea that Fukuzawa (whom you seem not to like to mention by name) was a potential poison to society as he tried to 'manufacture' a different type of society for Japan. Let us hypothesise then what would have happened had the 'Restoration' not gone ahead, and the Shogunate had continued to 'rule' Japan: the Shogunate's stranglehold on society would have increased, its ritualistic nature would have enveloped Japan and chastised it in a methodology that was both antiquated and irrelevant, not to mention the effect it would have had on economics of an already impoverished nation. I am not against the Shogunate per se, just what it meant for Japan's future.

    [me] Japan's future has always been in Asia, but since that never came to fruition 60 years ago, because of past transgressions, then it was only logical for the nation to choose a path of aggressive industrialization. However, Fukuzawa took it too far. Not only did he want to Westernize quickly, but he wanted to incorporate Western values and ethics into an already harmonized society. Not even the Shogunate was entirely opposed to Western innovation. Even the great Tokugawa himself entertained foreign dignitaries and Western ideologies, and even Western warfare methods. He himself was a man well versed in Western ways, but yet felt that the country should not hurry to Westernize. Many of samurai followed a similar conviction, while others maintained a 100% exclusionary stance of " no foreigners."]

    [you] Sure, you can now argue that Japan, after it was forced to embrace Western values at the end of the war, has found itself in exactly the same position as it was headed towards with the Shogunate, however I get the distinct feeling that Japan would now mean absolutely nothing to the world had it have maintained its course with the Shogunate, and therefore its opinions and its people would have been disregarded; this may not mean that much to some, but in an ever globalised society it means everything. At least now, Japan, much like Britain, has had its fifteen minutes of fame, and is now recognised for its successes and its advances in this world, rather than for nothing at all.

    [me] What does Japan mean to the world? What opinions? Japan has always had a lack of both opinions and meanings according to the international community. If you are talking about innovations - not inventions - then "yes" I can see your point. Japan hasn't really produced anything for the world then and now is how I see it, so I feel the country is less better off now then it was during the shogunate's rule.]

    [you] Blending philosophies, societies and cultures scares many people because the human condition does not take kindly to change, and sees it as an eradication of a nation's independence. Let me state then, that it was this exact independence that was isolating Japan further and yet further from the rest of the world, and it was through conduits such as Fukuzawa, that nations such as Japan have become some of the biggest driving forces of the 'modern age', whatever you believe that to be.

    [me] Britain and the U.S. were both isolationist nations. The United States of America has probably been around for a little over 200 years and yet had managed to be not only the bulwark of isolationism, but perhaps the only nation in the world whose foreign policy was defined by isolationism for over a quarter century even according to today’s standards.. People like Thomas Paine, Anglo-American political philosopher, was a staunch advocate of isolationism whose efforts saw through both the American Revolution (1775-1783) and the French Revolution(1789-1799). According to Goerge Washington in his Farewell Address he said: “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.” How effective were such exclusionary policies will depend largely on whether or not these policies benefited the respective countries in terms of racial harmony and or economic hegemony. – only time will tell or maybe time has already told us, or on us.

    If we were to fast forward a bit after George Washington, let’s say 1945, American senator Robert Rice, who was an unabashed isolationist and Anglophobe, whose foreign policy position alienated him from Delano Roosevelt, advocated strict limits on immigration, by 90%, and the registration of all aliens because he feared that loose immigration laws would threaten the security of the job market in the U.S.

    American politician Pat Buchanan who was runner up in the 2000 presidential election was another infamous modern day isolationist who advocated policies such as “America First” which would’ve lifted trade barriers while using the federal government to protect American jobs and other interest.

    “In great cities men are brought together by the desire of gain. They are not in a state of co-operation, but of isolation, as to the making of fortunes; and for all the rest they are careless of neighbors. Christianity teaches us to love our neighbors as ourselves; modern society acknowledges no neighbor [Benjamin Disraeli former Prime Minister of England].
  • caughtredhanded
    Tony,


    Again, thanks for your comments; I'm glad that my response provoked such a counter-response: a rarity in the blogosphere, so thank you very much! I can't help thinking that perhaps I may have offended you though: that certainly wasn't my case, as my response was simply a matter of causality.

    Again, you make some very interesting points, and I believe that on the majority, we shall have to agree to disagree, otherwise we could get into a situation of which we will never hope to move on, however if I may take on a couple of the aspects, I will:

    You refer back to your analogy about the car, and that it is distinctly a Western invention, therefore ultimately the East should reject it. Is that really the case? Are you saying that the East, i.e. Japan in this case, should reject all Western inventions simply on the basis that they were not made in the East? If that is the case, then there a great raft of examples that the East would never be privy to, and vice versa. How then would we ever be able to understand one another? The two halves of the planet cannot live in perfect isolationism, disregarded the actions of the other, that is not how this planet works. Sure, it worked for the most part of human history, but in a world such as that which we have now (which I am not saying is perfect, by any means) then how can that be expected to function?

    A great many people have chosen to pick up the gauntlet and 'amend' the pathway of Japanese history, not just Fukuzawa. Of course, as you mention, it was at the bequest of the Shogunate that he ended up in America and then Europe in the first place, therefore an understanding of 'the other side' was always the intention of the Shogunate. Of course, it never expected those ideals to be used in the way that Fukuzawa intended them to be replace the Shogunate, as men with power seek only more power, therefore why would they seek to eradicate themselves? Unfortunately however, the Shogunate had come to stalemate: it could not regress, and it certainly could not continue. Even if Fukuzawa had not looked to advocate Western ideas, then somebody else would have been in his place, and if not that man, then another, and another and another. I know it sounds like an inevitability, but I do hold the view that the Shogunate, though great in the beginning (and I advocate many actions and philosophies of it, please do not misunderstand me on that regard) had had its day, and a new driving force had to be installed.

    For all the innovations of which Japan is famous, it could not innovate in the domain of politics, and so acceptance of Westernisation was, for better or for worse, inevitable.

    Furthermore, I do not believe that isolationism solves anything, regardless of whether America was isolationist was a great part of its history or not. America is far from perfect, and a completely different animal to Japan, so the comparison, for me, does not hold credence, though insightful all the same.
  • Wow! this is really eye opening. I've learnt a lot from this entry
  • caughtredhanded
    Ah Rene, thank you very much for your comments; I'm glad you got something out of it! He really is a remarkable character.
  • wow very detailed history lesson here, I'll have to reread to absorb it all
  • caughtredhanded
    It is isn't it! Why not listen to it via RedBox instead, and then all the hard work is done for you!
  • ken
    did you forget to mention that he founded Keio University as well? ^^.
  • caughtredhanded
    Hey Ken. Yes, I did omit it from my post, but there was already a huge amount of info in there, I was in serious danger of overkilling I think, so it had to be chopped out I'm afraid.

    A good point all the same though, and one well made now by your good self!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Contact C*R-h

Now Showing



Freshly Caught Tweets


Recent Catches

手伝ってください!
July 23, 2010
By Ryan
Why?
Why?
July 3, 2010
By Ryan
C*R-h On Tour In Tokyo: Part One
C*R-h On Tour In Tokyo: Part One
June 17, 2010
By Ryan
Down And Out In Tokyo
Down And Out In Tokyo
June 11, 2010
By Brett
有名!3: Yoko Ono
有名!3: Yoko Ono
May 2, 2010
By Ryan
Project: 東京
Project: 東京
April 17, 2010
By Ryan
Your Jblog Needs You!
Your Jblog Needs You!
April 9, 2010
By Ryan
Entrapment Theory
Entrapment Theory
April 2, 2010
By Ryan
Mayday! Mayday!
Mayday! Mayday!
March 13, 2010
By Ryan
Stroke of Genius
Stroke of Genius
March 7, 2010
By Ryan